A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by legislation." It really is properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
In accordance with the EPA charge schedule, the request should be limited in scope, and never be intended for redistribution over the internet or for commercial purposes.
116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as set forth would not implement, as the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, fairly he continues to be acquitted of the criminal charges based on evidence and it can be perfectly-settled regulation that once the civil servant is acquitted during the criminal case, then on this very charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment through the department and held him disqualified to the post because acquittal for all long term purposes. The aforesaid proposition has become established at naught from the Supreme Court of Pakistan within the case on the District Police Officer Mainwali and a pair of others v.
Some bodies are given statutory powers to issue assistance with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, including the Highway Code.
139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Specified the legal analysis on the topic issue, we are on the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally sound, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, they are subject to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case in the petitioners for promotion might be regarded as, however, we're crystal clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, matter to availability of vacancy matter to your approval in the competent authority.
eighty two . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
be set up without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This is often a horrifying reality, a particularly reduced threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
forty eight . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice in the Peace u/s 22-A isn't obliged to afford a chance of hearing towards the accused party; nor obliged to automatically or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to take into account all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a lot of the relevant factors. Read more
Online access for the case management system to the Court of Appeals of Virginia. Cases can be searched using name or case number.
VI) The petitioner is driving the bars since arrest, investigation of your case is complete, he isn't any more needed for that purpose of investigation and at this stage to keep him driving the bars before conclusion of trial will serve no beneficial purpose.
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to generally be gathered with the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
[three] For example, in England, the High Court along with the Court of Appeals are each bound by their individual previous decisions, however, Because the Practice Statement 1966 the Supreme Court from the United Kingdom can deviate from its earlier decisions, While in practice it not often does. A notable example of when the court has overturned its precedent will be the case of R v Jogee, where the Supreme Court with the United Kingdom ruled that it and also the other courts of England and Wales had misapplied the legislation for nearly thirty years.
ninety . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is also important to note that neither seniority nor promotion may special cases of first law of thermodynamics be the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion could possibly be claimed or granted without the actual size of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular size of service for getting to be entitled to get regarded as for promotion to some higher grade, of course, just isn't without logic because the officer who's at first inducted to the particular post needs to provide over the said post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and to provide the public in a befitting fashion.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to determine a commission of internationally known and acknowledged experts to review and rule on potential grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power lines.